We've done pretty well with our Morning News Tournament of Books brackets this year. So a shot of overconfidence helped us decide to go all in early and predict the winner of the entire thing as we enter the Zombie Rounds. We're feeling pretty confident of our chances (which should scare us), so we're going to call it.
In the Zombie Rounds, we're predicting The Turner House knocks out A Little Life, and we're fairly confident that The Sellout will put the smackdown on Fates and Furies (and I hope it hurts).
That leaves The Turner House up against The Sellout - a terrific pairing of books that each examine race and economic issues with very different styles.
Although we both absolutely love these two books, The Turner House has an edge for us. It has more depth and heart - hitting us right in the emotions with all the feels. The Sellout is more of a searing and sarcastic read, and while we loved its snarkiness, Turner House was a bit more accomplished and quietly compelling.
What an amazing first novel from Angela Flourney! And that makes us wonder, how many first-time books have taken it all in the Tournament of Books? We'll have to ask the Rooster.
And so we close out another month of March Book Madness with 16 fantastic books. It was especially fun having my daughter Aana join in on the calls this year! I may have to ask her to be a part of my fall predictions for the Man Booker Prize - if I haven't exhausted her with this whirlwind of a ride.
Until next year!
Showing posts with label The Morning News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Morning News. Show all posts
Round Two: Shoot and Score
It's round two for our prognostications for The Morning News Tournament of Books, and we're going into it feeling kinda frisky. We ended last week with a perfect score - calling 4 out of 4 matches. But the books this week are a little harder to call, so we aren't letting those on-target wins go to our heads.
I'm the only one crazy enough to have read all of the books on the list, as I try to do every year, but this year I didn't give Aana enough time to finish them all, so there are two below that I'll call on my own.
Aana is known for regularly finding 4- and even 5-leaf clovers, so I'm going to hope that her luck rubs off on us and lets us call a perfect game, or bracket as the case may be.
So let's play ball!
The Contest: The Game of Life
The Competitors: A Little Life vs. The New World
Cheminne Picks: A Little Life, by Hanya Yanagihara
Aana Picks: A Little Life, by Hanya Yanagihara
Why this one, Cheminne? Both of these books do have a common thread - it's the idea of what a life is worth, and how someone survives whatever life throws at them. For The New World, that includes how one survives death. Yes, survives. Jim is a chaplain at a hospital and he asks for his head to be frozen after death, to allow him to live again in the distant future. His wife Jane, a surgeon at the same hospital, is completely caught off guard, only finding out about Jim's plan after he (and his head) are already gone. Alternate chapters look at Jim's future self and Jane's rage against the machine and company that took him there. But here's the core issue I had with the book - I didn't care about either one of them. They left me as cold as the cryogenic tank Jim was frozen in.
But oh - A Little Life. I cared very deeply for the characters in A Little Life. In fact, it's one of the books that will definitely stay with me for a long time. It's the story of four college friends, Jude, Willem, Malcolm, and JB - but it really centers on Jude. He has a secret, much like Jim in The New World, a horrific childhood that haunts his present and his future. Through his friends, Jim finds a family, but not quite security, still haunted by the all-too-real demons that make him feel less than worthy of the love his friends offer. The New World is 158 pages and I couldn't wait for it to end. At 700 pages, A Little Life seemed too short. That says it all.
Why this one, Aana? Honestly, I didn’t read either of
these. I’m going to go with what mom says because mom almost always knows best. [Good call, says mom.]
TOB match to be decided March 15.
The Contest: International Match
The Competitors: The Book of Aron vs. The Tsar of
Love and Techno
Cheminne Picks: The Tsar of Love and Techno, by Anthony
Marra
Aana Picks: The Tsar of Love and Techno, by Anthony
Marra
Why this one, Cheminne? First, let it sink in that I chose a book of short stories to win this contest. If you read this blog, you know that I dislike short stories for the most part. Tsar, however, reads like a novel, with lines that connect and lives that intersect in fascinating ways. The writing is lyrical and lovely; so good, in fact, that I kept a few lines aside to treasure. Like: "The stomach is not the only organ that hungers." Or: "You remain the hero of your own story, even when you become the villain of someone else's." This is one of my top three books in TOB this year, so I hope it continues to rise in the ranks.
On the other side of the coin, I also loved The Book of Aron. It is a heart-wrenching and often painful story of Polish Jews walled up in their ghetto, and centers on a real-life character, Dr. Korczak, and a fictional character, a young boy named Aron. For Aron, the harsh and frightening realities of war, poverty, and hunger bring challenges and opportunity as he finds himself working both with smugglers and the Gestapo. As Aron's family disappears one by one, he ends up in Korczak's orphanage, trying to help the doctor feed and clothe the hundreds of children he has taken in. It was difficult to choose between these two books, as both are gripping and well written. But Tsar's ability to make me feel every emotion on the spectrum in one simple sentence is what took it over the top for me.
Why this one, Aana? It’s amazing. The stories in this
book are all about Russia from the Soviet era to the modern day. Every story is
beautiful in its self-contained singularity, but even more beautiful when you
start to realize that they all fit together. This book shows that seemingly
small decisions or coincidences in one person’s life can have extremely
significant, profound effects in the lives of others. The characters in these
stories are all flawed, but the reader will be able to identify with some part
of each and every one – whether it’s the devastating devotion of a mother to
her wayward child or the need to seek out any shred of information on a missing
loved one. However serious the subject matter of these stories, they’re told
with a cleverness and dark humor that I think is genius. Swimming in toxic
waste, being forced to work in a garden as a prisoner of war, and trying to get
arrested in order to avoid being drafted to serve in Chechnya are all described
with a mix of candor and pique that is irresistible. Seriously, this is a must-read for anyone, whether you enjoy short stories or not. Oh, and a tip: the
audiobook is great because the narrators are Russian speakers.
TOB match to be decided March 16.
The Contest: The Odd Couple
The Competitors: A Spool of Blue Thread vs. The
Story of My Teeth
Cheminne Picks: The Story of My Teeth, by Valeria Luiselli
Aana Picks: A Spool of Blue Thread, by Anne Tyler
Why this one, Cheminne? As much as I hate to think about John Irving more than I have to, it would have been very intriguing to see Avenue of Mysteries paired up with The Story of My Teeth - both about men and Mexico. In fact, I almost wonder if the creators of the brackets thought Irving was a shoo-in when they set this up. But that was not to be since Anne Tyler's book was the one that advanced from the Play-In Round. And it may surprise Aana to see that I chose Teeth over Tyler, but despite the off-putting idea of the title, The Story of My Teeth was a surprisingly refreshing new idea in literature for me. On the surface, it is the story of Highway, a self-made auctioneer in Mexico who is determined to own Marilyn Monroe's teeth. So to pay for them, he auctions his own teeth and tells prospective buyers fantastical lies, that each tooth belonged to a famous person like Plato or Virginia Woolf. Once he owns Monroe's (supposed) teeth, he has them put into his own mouth, but they are later stolen by his once-abandoned son. Believe it or not, that isn't the most interesting part of this book. Once his teeth are stolen, Highway ends up in a strange and unsettling encounter with clowns that leaves the reader wondering what is reality and what is not, who is telling lies, and where the truth really lies. At the end, you realize that the reader is really part of the story, and is able to (invited to) interpret it as they like. I loved that surprise ending and the unusual invitation of a writer to make the reader part of the story. The book was actually written for, and inspired by, an art exhibition and is in itself a work of experimental art.
Why this one, Aana? I didn’t read either of these
either, but The Story of My Teeth sounded really creepy and I didn’t like the
premise.
TOB match to be decided March 17.
The Contest: The Satirical Sides
The Competitors: The Sellout vs. The Invaders
Cheminne Picks: The Sellout, by Paul Beatty
Aana Picks: The Sellout, by Paul Beatty
Why this one, Cheminne? These books again have a common idea - holding a mirror up to society's ills. The Invaders, however, never really satisfies with its all-too-common idea of a fish-out-of-water, a second wife who isn't accepted into the social set that her husband swims in. When she commits a horrific act, she finds herself rebelling against the rules set in place by money and class. The final denouement of a hurricane washing clean the small coastal Hamptons-esque town was too much for me, though. It was a set-up that didn't pay off, for a story that's been told one too many times.
That cannot be said about The Sellout, a raucous raunchy satire that reminded me of Chris Rock's in-your-face comedy. Nothing was sacred or off limits and it made me laugh out loud. Not something you would normally say about a book that covers slavery, racism, discrimination, violence, and police brutality. But it is funny - with a kernel of pain thrown in to remind us that it isn't really funny at all. The central character, never really given a name, is raised by a social scientist father who loves to use his son as an experiment. When his father dies, and his town is removed from the map, the narrator decides he will also experiment with society's norms, determined to bring his town back. He's joined by Hominy, an actor who played stereotypical black roles in early movies and who is now upset that his fans might not be able to find him with the town gone. He begs (literally) to have the narrator take him on as a slave, and the two of them segregate their new version of their old town. In a time where race is becoming a defining issue in the presidential campaign, The Sellout is the most brutal and honest conversation about race we may have this year. Maybe all the candidates should read it, too.
Why this one, Aana? The Sellout was hilarious. It’s a
Swiftian satire in which the narrator proposes a return to segregation as a
solution for the problems associated with racism. Interestingly, in this book, segregation
also seems to be a solution for the problems associated with ignoring racism or
trying to pretend that racism doesn’t exist. I think most readers will be able
to identify with the themes presented and I hope nobody takes it too seriously,
because this book is FUNNY. It’s got a sense of style that many new books lack,
and the characters are just cool in a way that a lot of authors don’t seem to
get these days. It’s a great read that will really make you think. I think a
lot of the essence of the story can be summed up in this quote by the main
character: “I’ve whispered racism in a post-racist world.”
TOB match to be decided March 18.
Labels:
anthony marra,
book reviews,
books,
hanya yanagihara,
March Madness,
reading,
The Morning News,
Tournament of Books
Are You Ready to Rumble?
I may not be a sports buff, but I do live in the South,
where March Madness is as serious as a heart attack and where even the smallest
child knows how to fill out a bracket.
This first week of March, as my fellow Southerners start
heating up decades-old basketball rivalries, I am going to fill you in on my
bracket, or who I would select as the winner of each pairing in the first round
of The Morning News Tournament of Books. In my opinion, this is the best of
the playoff games for bookworms. And this year, it’s a family affair as my
daughter Aana weighs in with her draft picks, too.
Interestingly, this week we seem to have the same taste in books. So we mixed things up in how we tell you about the books. I can promise you we won't always agree.
Here's how this will work: Today we’re going to look at the
first five pairings to tell you how we would judge them. At the end of the
week, we’ll review how the judges called each contest, and we’ll tell you more
about each book.
Feel free to offer your own color commentary as we move
through the month-long contest.
Now it’s time for the tip-off – so blow that whistle!
The Contest: Play-In Picks
The Competitors: Avenue of Mysteries vs. A Spool
of Blue Thread
Cheminne Picks: A Spool of Blue Thread, by Anne
Tyler
Aana Picks: A Spool of Blue Thread, by Anne Tyler
Why this one, Cheminne? Let me explain this as
succinctly as possible - John Irving is a misogynist who loves to write about
himself. Every book follows that formula and this one is no different. Anne
Tyler, on the other hand, does what I admire so much – she illuminates the
ordinary and shows us all that every life is worth examining and celebrating.
Her words are spare and unsentimental and the family she writes about in Spool
is candid and familiar. No contest.
Why this one, Aana? I never even read A Spool of Blue
Thread, but anything is better than John Irving. He comes off like a pompous
older man who thinks he knows everything about everything. It’s almost like
some wealthy older Anglo guy took a trip to Mexico and now he “just knows” the
Mexicans, he “just gets them, ya know?” I really didn’t need all the insider
information on beta blockers and Viagra either. It’s like getting stuck talking
to your aging, wealthy, bigoted boss at a Christmas party after he’s had a few.
It’s pretentious and creepy. Not recommended.
TOB match to be decided March 8.
The Contest: The Fighters
The Competitors: Fates and Furies vs. Bats of the
Republic
Cheminne Picks: Bats of the Republic, by Zachary
Thomas Dodson
Aana Picks: Bats of the Republic, by Zachary Thomas
Dodson
Why this one, Cheminne? Both of these books have
something to hide. One of them makes the secret worth the search; the other
does not. What they both share, unfortunately, is familiarity. Fates is a story
that should surprise, especially when you hit the Furies section of the book.
But by the time you reach that second half, you feel as if you’ve been watching
a married couple bicker in front of you for hours at dinner. Which is basically
the premise of the book, so the “surprise” is more like relief when it comes. Bats
is much more entertaining, but would be even better if we hadn’t had a few
years of books that already included maps, hand drawings, diagrams, and
scrapbooks to help tell the tale. What saves Bats is that it still is a unique
story-within-a-story that keeps your attention through till the end.
Why this one, Aana? Buy this book in hardcover! The
illustrations and cover lining are awesome. I really liked how the author
reveals a little at a time about each character and their history. In some
places, you can get a little lost, but it’s well worth it. The way the stories
intertwine is really interesting and will definitely keep you turning the
pages. Also, there is an envelope marked “DO NOT OPEN” at the end of the book.
Do not open it until the very end, no matter how much you may want to peek!
It’s much more rewarding that way.
TOB match to be decided March 9.
The Contest: The Obfuscators
The Competitors: The Sympathizer vs. Oreo
Cheminne Picks: The Sympathizer, by Viet Thanh Nguyen
Aana Picks: The Sympathizer, by Viet Thanh Nguyen
Why this one, Cheminne? First I have a bone to pick with TOB - Oreo was originally published in 1974. Yes, it was re-released in 2015 (the year for the books in the contest), and yes it's a good book. However, there were 80 or so other good books that should have been put into the short list. Okay, rant over. When placed in a match against The Sympathizer, Oreo makes a lot of sense for this list. Both books center on a protagonist who has something to hide or discover. Oreo is a girl who is black and Jewish, on a search for her father in a clever twist on a classical odyssey tale from Ancient Greece. The plays on words and mixes of dialects made it both fun and frustrating. Ultimately, the character in The Sympathizer had more depth and meaning for me. The layers were more interesting to peel back: French and Vietnamese, Communist masquerading as capitalist, loner finding love, spy hiding in plain sight. There were many more puzzles to piece together, particularly by the main character himself. Having spent so many years wearing masks to suit whatever situation he happened to be in, he actually may not remember who he really is. Fabulous book that ultimately was much more impactful.
Why this one, Aana? I loved both of these books, so this contest was really hard
for me. Oreo gave us a heroine for the modern age, with amazing writing and
clever turns of phrase. I mean, she refers to getting her period as "Flag
Day." The Sympathizer gave us an anti-hero whose story was as twisted as
his moral compass. The story opened my eyes about aspects of the Vietnam War I
never knew about, and I found myself sympathizing with the sympathizer. What
decided this contest for me was that I eventually got a teeny bit tired of all
the puns and wordplay in Oreo. Read both! They're great! A side note - Oreo was
originally published in 1974, which is around the time period in which The
Sympathizer is set. Not sure what it's doing in the Tournament of Books for
2016, but oh well...
TOB match to be decided March 10.
The Contest: The Smack Down
The Competitors: The Turner House vs. Ban en
Banlieue
Cheminne Picks: The Turner House, by Angela
Flournoy
Aana Picks: The Turner House, by Angela Flournoy
Why this one, Cheminne? This was really an unfair fight
– The Turner House is 3 times bigger, and Ban is poetry. Turner is a
fully-thought-out book with a beginning, middle, and end, and Ban
is written as if it’s the original sketch of an idea rather than a published
book. In a perfect world, Turner should have been pitted against A Spool of
Blue Thread – it would have been a fairer fight. Both of those books center on families coming together to decide what to do with aging parents and the emotions that inevitably are stirred up in those situations. In that match-up, I still would have selected Turner. The contemporary setting of Detroit and themes of upside-down mortgages gave it a realism that was both unsettling and engaging. There were almost too many characters - but what do you expect in a family with 13 children? Turner also, refreshingly, didn't wrap it all up with a neat and tidy bow, instead letting the story play out more realistically.
Why this one, Aana? Because Ban en Banlieue was not my
cup of tea. I should’ve known when the nice lady at Barnes and Noble informed
me that Ban en Banlieue would be in the poetry section if it had been in stock.
It’s not that I don’t like poetry, it’s just that most poetry doesn’t engage
me. This book not only didn’t engage me, I found it totally incomprehensible.
At least it was only 109 pages. I appreciate the thought and meaning behind it,
just not the vessel for delivering said thought and meaning. It seemed more
like someone trying to describe a vague dream they had of a piece of
performance art than a cohesive story. Or maybe a performance artist drunkenly
writing notes about their upcoming work. If you’re not going to allow
nonfiction, Tournament of Books, then PLEASE – no more “poetry!”
TOB match to be decided March 11.
The Contest: The "Evildoers"
The Competitors: Our Souls at Night vs. The Whites
Cheminne Picks: The Whites, by Richard Price
Aana Picks: The Whites, by Richard Price
Why this one, Cheminne? The TOB Rooster has a sick sense of humor. Why else would the sweet Souls be paired up with the gritty Whites? Both books do offer a look at what happens when you do the "wrong thing," but in Souls it's more about going against the norm and forgetting about what everyone else thinks. Against any other book, Souls might have won. But against the full-throttle-rush-ride of The Whites, it just didn't have the juice. The Whites was the one book on this week's list that I could not put down - it was a slithery look at the underbelly of New York's darker streets and the cops that take justice into their own hands. The Sympathizer and The Whites are my "books to watch" so far in this season's tournament.
Why this one, Aana? I thought Our Souls at Night was a very sweet book about
older people doing whatever they wanted and saying "to hell with everyone
else." I think the author may have intended the events in the book to be
somewhat shocking, or at least out of the ordinary, but to me it was just a
sweet, melancholy story. The Whites, on the other hand, was truly shocking and
gripped you by the throat throughout the story. It was visceral and intense,
which I found more engaging than Our Souls at Night. Fans of The Departed (like
me) will love The Whites.
TOB match to be decided March 14.
Labels:
Angela Flournoy,
Bats of the Republic,
book review,
books,
reading,
review,
The Morning News,
The Sympathizer,
Tournament of Books
Review: The Orphan Master's Son
For the second year in a row, a Zombie book has won the Tournament of Books, brought to you by The Morning News. Last year, I completely disagreed with the overall winner. This year, although it wasn't the book I selected to win, I am very happy that The Orphan Master's Son took home the coveted Rooster prize.
Pak Jun Do is the "son" from the title, who grew up in an orphanage run by his father. He learned early on to live two lives, pretending that his father was not related to him so that he could remain in the orphanage.
Jun Do (whose name is a definite nod to John Doe), grows up both anonymous and a mirror of whatever others want to see in him. He becomes a kidnapper for the state, grabbing whoever the country's leaders need from the shores of South Korea and Japan – like a doctor, or a sports pro, or even a prospective bride for a prominent politician.
His life of secrecy, and an ear for other languages, later makes him the perfect spy to be posted on a fishing trawler, listening to radio transmissions from other countries. A pivotal encounter with the U.S. Navy changes everything when Jun Do and his shipmates create a story about one of their number being thrown to the sharks, rather than having to tell the authorities he has escaped. They even go so far as to give Jun Do a severe wound from a dead shark's mouth to lend credence to the story.
Returning to the shores as a "hero," Jun Do is selected by the government to pretend to be a diplomat. His newest mission is to fly to Texas on a secret trip to get concessions from the U.S. government. When he expresses doubt about his ability to convince the Americans of his new identity, his handler Dr. Song tells him, “Where we are from, stories are factual. If a farmer is declared a musical virtuoso by the state, everyone had better start calling him maestro. And secretly, he’d be wise to start practicing the piano.”
That single quote gets to the heart of this book, and really defines why North Korea could be teetering on the verge of an un-winnable war. The trip to Texas also brings into focus the conundrum that we who have lived in freedom cannot understand about those who have lived under a totalitarian government.
As Jun Do visits the ranch of an influential senator, he looks through family photos and is almost overwhelmed by what he sees: “This was a family start to finish, without wars or famines or political prisons, without a stranger coming to town to drown your daughter.”
But when asked if he would ever want to remain in the U.S., particularly since he has no family ties himself in North Korea, Jun Do asks, “Are there labor camps? Mandatory marriages? Forced-criticism sessions? Loudspeakers?” When he is told that there are none of those things in the U.S., he responds: “Then I’m not sure I could ever feel free here. In my country everything makes simple, clear sense. It’s the most straightforward place on Earth.”
Jun Do returns to his country and to yet another identity. But this time, his new persona is a high-ranking official, and Jun Do has the opportunity to reveal his true self through this facade.
After all, as one of the people he meets in Texas tells him, “A John Doe has an exact identity. It’s just yet to be discovered.”
Although it's a work of fiction, Adam Johnson has added enough of the real-world North Korea to his book to bring the country to life – including details like actual kidnappings, the strange Vinalon fabric that is unique to North Korea, the deprivation, and the sheep-like following that the people seem to have for their government.
Given the almost mind-boggling declarations of superiority coming from Kim Jong-un, The Orphan Master's Son at least offers some sort of explanation, that this is a country that is propped up by its lies to the point where almost no one knows what the truth is anymore.
Labels:
Adam Johnson,
book reviews,
North Korea,
review,
The Morning News,
The Orphan Master's Son,
Tournament of Books
Eating Up the Brackets
Now I've seen everything. You've read the recent posts I've done about The Morning News and its book bracket. Well Garden & Gun magazine is now doing a Southern food bracket. And someone out there is even doing a basketball bracket, apparently.Garden & Gun splits its bracket into four categories: Classic, Barbecue, Low Country, and Cajun/Creole. This fight is almost down to the Final Four (which sounds familiar, no?). And you can vote on all of your favorites.
Evidently, Cornbread beat out Mac & Cheese to advance in the Barbecue segment. Does that even make sense? First, there is no barbecue involved. And second, how in the world could Mac & Cheese beat Cornbread? My Southern-girl roots are deeply offended.
Oh, and why isn't biscuits-and-gravy included? Was the person who compiled this bracket even Southern? But I digress.
Yesterday, I voted for Shrimp & Grits over Hoppin' John in the Low Country category, but Hoppin' John won. Over grits. Oh, and did I mention the grits? The one foodstuff that originated in the South? Humph.
Today's vote will cause family rifts – it pits Fried Chicken against Country Fried Steak. My husband and I could have a fight over that one (I voted for Fried Chicken).
And tomorrow it's Beignets vs. Gumbo in the Cajun/Creole segment. Duh – fried dough with sugar wins every time. Just go to any county fair in the South if you don't agree and you'll see what I mean. The overall winner will be announced on April 9.
I'll keep an eye on this bracket, just like I'm keeping you up to date on The Morning News Tournament of Books. Time to check in on the Zombie Rounds.
As I told you on Monday, this is the one chance for fans to vote books back into contention (raising them from the dead, so to speak). And what do you know, some
Never thought I'd root for baseball, but "Go Fielding!"
You Be the Judge
Last week, the winners were announced for the National Book Critics Circle Awards (click here). I think critics pride themselves on finding that one book that hasn't received all the hype, the title that slid under the radar. This year's winners definitely fit that description. In the Fiction category, the winner was Edith Pearlman for Binocular Vision, a short-story collection. For Nonfiction, the winner was Maya Jasanoff for Liberty's Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary World.
For Biography, the award went to John Lewis Gaddis for George F. Kennan: An American Life (I've never heard of him, either). The Autobiography award was presented to Mira Bartok for The Memory Palace: A Memoir. And in Poetry, the winner was Laura Kasischke for Space, in Chains. And, of course, there were awards for the critics themselves, with one honoring Geoff Dyer for his critical essays.
So, how many of those books have you read? Probably just as many as I have. In fact, I'm on hundreds of book sites every week and I've only heard of one those titles.
That isn't a bad thing, I think it's refreshing. The overhyped books tend to let me down.
Speaking of hype, let's check our Tournament of Books bracket, brought to you by The Morning News.
On March 9, Lightning Rods by Helen DeWitt took the lead over Salvage the Bones by Jesmyn Ward.
And today, 1Q84 by Haruki Murakami beat out The Last Brother by Nathacha Appanah.
Tomorrow, The Stranger's Child is pitted against The Tiger's Wife (which sounds a bit one-sided just from the titles).
We'll keep an eye on the competition as we head into the Great Eight and then the Final Four.
Sweet 16 Tournament
If you live in the South, spring means two things – the humidity is about to dump on us like hot Jello and it's time for March Madness. A newbie may think those two things are the same thing. But no. March Madness refers, of course, to basketball. Here's the general gist, according to The Morning News site: "A ridiculously small and poorly informed group of TMN editors and contributors have chosen 16 of the most cherished, hyped, ignored, and/or enthusiastically praised books of the year to enter into a month-long tournament, NCAA-basketball-madness style.
"We take these books and seed them, with the odds-on favorites receiving 1 seed and longer shots receiving 4 seeds. Then we place them in an NCAA-style tournament bracket and assign books in pairs to judges, who read both assigned books, advancing one."
Sounds as good as any other book awards set-up that I've heard of. And just as arbitrary!
This year's Sweet 16 books are:
Julian Barnes, The Sense of an Ending
Nathacha Appanah, The Last Brother
Teju Cole, Open City
Helen DeWitt, Lightning Rods
Patrick deWitt, The Sisters Brothers
Jeffrey Eugenides, The Marriage Plot
Chad Harbach, The Art of Fielding
Alan Hollinghurst, Stranger’s Child
Jesmyn Ward, Salvage the Bones
Haruki Murakami, 1Q84
Téa Obreht, The Tiger’s Wife
Michael Ondaatje, The Cat’s Table
Ann Patchett, State of Wonder
Donald Ray Pollock, The Devil All the Time
Karen Russell, Swamplandia
Kate Zambreno, Green Girl
In the first round, The Sense of an Ending put the smack-down on The Devil All the Time – or at least judge Emma Straub delivered the smack-down.
So now you have one name to fill in your bracket. Oh, you didn't think there was a bracket? Madness.
Labels:
awards,
books,
Donald Ray Pollock,
Emma Straub,
Field Notes,
Julian Barnes,
Powell's Books,
The Morning News
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



